In order for INTERPOL to publish a Red Notice, one of its 188 member countries must first request the Red Notice based upon certain criteria.  This request is made by the member country’s National Central Bureau (NCB).  Today’s post addresses the question of what can be done when an NCB submits erroneous or false information

As some unfortunate souls have discovered, iNTERPOL sometimes publishes information that is simply wrong. Due to the “honor system” it uses to allow member countries to request Red Notices, there are instances where INTERPOL issues a Red Notice containing erroneous information, which can happen in one of several ways:

  1. The underlying charge is completely fabricated

How could INTERPOL shield itself from being used as a political weapon against a corrupt country’s own people?  In the last post, I referenced an article by CNN writer Libby Lewis entitled, “Are some countries abusing Interpol?”  In the article, Lewis raises numerous questions, one of which is whether a more in-depth review process

Continuing with the issue addressed in the last post, today’s post addresses banking and the effect of a Red Notice on a person’s ability to maintain an account at a financial institution.  Specifically, how does a financial institution know about a pending Red Notice?

A majority of banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions subscribe

As INTERPOL has developed over time, it has experienced the growing pains that normally attend any large and relatively complex entity, and also some that are more specific to its own, unusual functions.  In his book that I love, The Legal Foundations of INTERPOL, Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha touched on one of these developments: