A reader recently sent in this question:
“hi, I am looking to assist a friend who is on an interpol red alert.
We wish to challenge the notice and have no idea how to gather the evidence allegedly supporting the notice .
any suggestions ?”
Any experienced, practicing attorney will likely understand why this question made my heart sink. Let me explain in the context of car repair.
It’s reasonable to think that some people are able to build their own automobile engine for the first time to use in their own automobile. If one has a sufficient background in automobiles, has installed engines built by others, and has studied engine building for some time, it would perhaps be a reasonable endeavor to attempt to build an engine, install it in a vehicle, and then drive it with one’s family members inside. Or, if the person was willing and able to spend the time researching and understanding vehicle design and repair, perhaps s/he could eventually become proficient enough to take on that challenge.
If not, the results can be disastrous and irreversibly damaging.
When I hear the kind of question such as that posed by our reader, above, it’s like hearing this about engine replacement:
“hi, I am looking to assist a friend who needs a new automobile engine.
We wish to build and install the engine and have no idea how to find the engine block or the other engine components.
The question is so broad that it tells me that the author, obviously good-hearted and well-intentioned, is also not (yet) qualified to do this work, and has not yet studied the issues related to the question in any depth.
The answer to this question is broad- and in addition to needing evidence that supports the notice, the reader needs evidence to support the arguments for removal. The answer depends on what the evidence is, where it is, who has it, whether it’s relevant or not to your argument, whether it’s reliable or not. It also depends on the grounds for seeking the removal, assuming they exist- what are they? Which rules/laws/treaties/conventions were violated? Finally, if the reader makes the attempt and fails, there is a good chance that INTERPOL’s rules will prohibit a second effort.
So the short answer – “Gather the evidence that supports your arguments from the places that your evidence exists- court dockets, public and private records, media accounts, etc., etc.”- presupposes that you know what your arguments are, that they are valid, and that there exists evidence to support them. In other words, the reader is prepared to build the engine and drive around in the vehicle with his/her family in the vehicle.
If that is all in place, then the reader should make the attempt. If not, s/he should find a qualified professional to assist.
As always, thoughts and comments are welcomed.