As discussed in the last post, here, INTERPOL’s new rules governing the CCF took effect in March. From a practitioner’s standpoint, among the more significant changes is the CCF’s new task of publishing its opinions and providing reasoning for them.
The CCF is now required to “endeavour to make its decisions, opinions, recommendations and
reports public in all working languages of the Organization.”
This language of the statute is devoid of hard deadlines or methods of publication- there are no assurances that the CCF’s decisions will be published monthly, quarterly, yearly, etc. In fact, there is not the requirement that the CCF actually publishes an opinion- simply that it must endeavor to do so.
However, the publication provision in the statute is still good news. This marks the first time that the CCF has obliged itself to even contemplate creating a public repository of opinions, and that would be a very useful thing for both the CCF and practitioners for a couple of reasons:
- Published decisions allow practicioners to better understand the CCF’s analytical process and the weight that the CCF gives to various types of arguments. Until now, we have been limited to reviewing our own cases or the relatively few media cases to gain insight as to the CCF’s deliberative process.
- Published decisions allow the CCF to receive better prepared requests for relief. An informed practitioner is an effective practitioner.
Now, we wait to see how and when this new practice will take effect.
Next time: new rule on the how quickly an attorney must act on the discovery of new information in an applicant’s case.
As always, thoughts and comments are welcomed.