A reader recently posed some questions about INTERPOL’s dissemination of information, and those questions are answered in today’s post.
Q: There has not been an annual report 2015 by Interpol so far – are there probably other sources that can tell numbers of red notices and diffusions issued in 2015 and numbers of valid notices/diffusions in circulation?
A: The annual report for the previous year is normally published in conjunction with INTERPOL’s annual General Assembly, which is usually held in October or November. The reports are published here. Otherwise, the number of Red Notices or diffusions issued are not made public, because INTERPOL’s member countries do not always request that their notices be publicized. In fact, a majority of them remain hidden from public view.
Q: Are ways to find out (by the numbers of notices/diffusions/arrested persons in annual reports) how many diffusions/red notices are deleted after Interpol indicated a political motive behind them?
A: INTERPOL’s CCF has included this information in its annual reports (see below) in the past, and it also has recently begun providing more specific information in its responses to requests for Red Notice removal. In the response letters, the individuals who applied for relief are now being informed more frequently of the reason for the removal of their notices. However, the CCF’s recommendations (which are almost always adopted and implemented by the General Secretariat) are not made public, so this information is available largely on an anecdotal basis.
Q: Are there any hints of inner political problems in Interpol?
A: INTERPOL is an international organization with over 190 member countries, each of which can claim varying levels of compliance with human rights standards, so some political problems are inevitable. The CCF, however, does a decent job of guarding itself from external influences, and its own annual reports often call the organization as a whole to task for the continual improvements that are needed to fulfill its obligation of remaining impartial in politically motivated cases, as well as other issues related to human rights protection. The annual reports are found here, and give insight to the issues that the CCF chooses to focus on from year to year.
As always, thoughts and comments are welcomed.